Open Access


Read more
image01

Online Manuscript Submission


Read more
image01

Submitted Manuscript Trail


Read more
image01

Online Payment


Read more
image01

Online Subscription


Read more
image01

Email Alert



Read more
image01

Original Research Article | OPEN ACCESS

Clinical Investigation of Treatment Failure in Type 2 Diabetic Patients Treated with Metformin and Glibenclamide at a Hospital in Northwestern Nigeria

Bilyaminu Abubakar1 , Rabiu T Giaze1, Ahmad Haliru2

1Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Usmanu Danfodiyo University, Sokoto; 2Ministry of Health, Gusau, Nigeria.

For correspondence:-  Bilyaminu Abubakar   Email: abu3163abu@yahoo.co.uk   Tel:+2348030648935

Received: 15 May 2014        Accepted: 2 August 2014        Published: 24 September 2014

Citation: Abubakar B, Giaze RT, Haliru A. Clinical Investigation of Treatment Failure in Type 2 Diabetic Patients Treated with Metformin and Glibenclamide at a Hospital in Northwestern Nigeria. Trop J Pharm Res 2014; 13(9):1521-1526 doi: 10.4314/tjpr.v13i9.20

© 2014 The authors.
This is an Open Access article that uses a funding model which does not charge readers or their institutions for access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0) and the Budapest Open Access Initiative (http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read), which permit unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited..

Abstract

Purpose: To examine body mass index (BMI), occupation, sex, age, and duration of therapy as contributory factors in treatment failure in type 2 diabetic patients taking metformin and glibenclamide in a tertiary hospital in Northwestern Nigeria.
Method: A retrospective case control study was employed where variables (age, sex, body mass index, tribe, duration of therapy, glycaemic profile and occupation) for a total of 520 type 2 diabetic patients that took metformin and glibenclamide for a minimum of 1 year were examined. Patients were classified into two groups based on progression to triple oral therapy or a switch from metformin and glibenclamide therapy.
Results: Of the 520 patients analysed, 276 failed treatment. Over 90 % of the patients were > 40 years while 61 % had been on treatment for > 4 years. The subjects’ mean age was 53.22 ± 9.03 years. The mean population body mass index (BMI) was 27 kg/m2. Housewives comprised more than half of the population (55.5 %). The mean fasting blood glucose and 2 h post prandial blood glucose levels of group 1 were 5.99 ± 0.67 mmol/L and 8.76 ± 2.19 mmol/L respectively while the corresponding values for group 2 were 12.55 ± 4.12 mmol/L and 18.42 ± 5.3 mmol/L, respectively.
Conclusion: Progressive deterioration in pancreatic ß-cell function, BMI > 28 kg/m2, advancing age, and young age at diagnosis were identified as contributory factors to the development of secondary failure in type 2 diabetics receiving metformin and glibenclamide.

Keywords: Diabetes, Glibenclamide, Metformin, Pancreatic ß-cell function, Treatment failure

Impact Factor
Thompson Reuters (ISI): 0.523 (2021)
H-5 index (Google Scholar): 39 (2021)

Article Tools

Share this article with



Article status: Free
Fulltext in PDF
Similar articles in Google
Similar article in this Journal:

Archives

2024; 23: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2023; 22: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2022; 21: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2021; 20: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2020; 19: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2019; 18: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2018; 17: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2017; 16: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2016; 15: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2015; 14: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2014; 13: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6,   7,   8,   9,   10,   11,   12
2013; 12: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2012; 11: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2011; 10: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2010; 9: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2009; 8: 
1,   2,   3,   4,   5,   6
2008; 7: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2007; 6: 
1,   2,   3,   4
2006; 5: 
1,   2
2005; 4: 
1,   2
2004; 3: 
1
2003; 2: 
1,   2
2002; 1: 
1,   2

News Updates